30/09/2018, 17:28

Các cấp độ trong một công việc IT

Các anh/chị đã đi làm, có thể giải thích giúp em thắc mắc trên với ạ. Em bắt gặp rất nhiều trên các tin tuyển dụng, ví dụ: Senior, Architect, … Nhưng mỗi nơi có lẽ phân cấp khác nhau, nên em muốn hỏi cho mở mang chút

Toan Ha viết 19:42 ngày 30/09/2018

Anh @ltd vào giải đáp giúp em với ạ !

Mai Anh Dũng viết 19:39 ngày 30/09/2018

Cảm ơn em đã đặt câu hỏi này. Cho anh suy nghĩ và trả lời câu hỏi này sau được không?

null viết 19:35 ngày 30/09/2018

Mình thử tìm kiếm thì thấy câu trả lời thế này: Entry > Junior > Senior http://programmers.stackexchange.com/a/14972

This will vary but this is how I see it at a place large enough to have distinctions between types of programmers.

I would say entry level and Junior are the same thing. They are just out of school and have less than two years of work experience. They are assigned the least complex tasks and should be supervised fairly closely. Generally they know about 10% of what they think they know. Usually they have not been through the whole development cycle and so often make some very naive choices if given the opportunity to choose. Sadly many of them don’t actually care what the requirement is, they want to build things their way. They often have poor debugging skills.

Intermediate level is where many programmers fall. They have more than two years experience and generally less than ten, although some can stay at this level their whole careers. They can produce working code with less supervision as long as they are assigned to relatively routine tasks. They are not generally tasked with high level design or highly complicated tasks that require an in-depth level of knowledge. They may be tasked with the design of a piece of the application though, especially as they are in the zone to become a senior developer. They are good at maintenance tasks or tasks where they can focus on just their piece of the puzzle, but are not usually expected to consider the application as a whole unless working with senior developers or being prepped for promotion to senior. They can usually do a decent job of troubleshooting and debugging, but they have to really slog through to get the hard ones. They do not yet have enough experience to see the patterns in the problems that point them to the probable place they are occurring. But they are gaining those skills and rarely need to ask for debugging help. They have probably been through the whole development cycle at least once and seen the results of design problems and are learning how to avoid them in the future. Usually they tend to be more likely to take a requirement at face value and not push it back when it has obvious problems or gaps. They have learned enough to know what they don’t know and are starting to gain that knowledge. They are the workhorses of the programming world, they deliver probably 80-90% of the routine code and maybe 10% of the very difficult stuff.

No one who is senior level even needs to ask this question. They are experts in their chosen technology stacks. They are given the hard tasks (the ones nobody knows how to solve) and often get design responsibilties. They often work independently because they have a proven track record of delivering the goods. They are expected to mentor Junior and intermediate developers. Often they are amazing troubleshooters. They have run into those same problems before and have a very good idea of where to look first. Seniors often mentor outside the workplace as well. They generally have at least ten years of experience and have almost always been on at least one death march and know exactly why some things are to be avoided. They know how to deliver a working product and meet a deadline. They know what corners can be cut and what corners should never be cut. They know at least one and often several languages at the expert level. They have seen a lot of “hot new technologies” hit the workplace and disappear, so they tend to be a bit more conservative about jumping on the bandwagon for the next exciting new development tool (but not completely resistant to change - those would be the older Intermediate developers who never make the leap to Senior). They understand their job is to deliver working software that does what the users want, not to play with fun tools. They are often pickier about where they will work because they can be and because they have seen first hand how bad some places can be. They seek out the places that have the most interesting tasks to do. Often they know more about their company’s products than anyone else even if they have been there only a few months. They know they need more than programming knowledge and are good at getting knowledge about the business domain they support as well. They are often aware of issues that juniors never consider and intermediates often don’t think about such as regulatory and legal issues in the business domain they support. They can and will push back a requirement because they know what the problems with it will be and can explain the same to the laymen.

Ngoài ra, mình còn tìm thấy 1 bảng phân cấp dài dòng hơn cho các công việc cụ thể http://sijinjoseph.com/programmer-competency-matrix/

Bài liên quan
0